Local

Mistrial declared in Palisades Fire arson case after jury deadlocks

Federal prosecutors said they would retry Jonathan Rinderknecht after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict in the Palisades Fire arson trial.

By Elena Park · June 26, 2026
Email Reporter
Mistrial declared in Palisades Fire arson case after jury deadlocks
CGN News / Cook Global News Network / Editor upload / All Rights Reserved

LOS ANGELES | A federal judge declared a mistrial in the Palisades Fire arson case after jurors deadlocked in the trial of Jonathan Rinderknecht, who has pleaded not guilty to charges connected to the deadly 2025 wildfire.

What happened

The Associated Press reported that jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict on three federal charges: arson, malicious destruction by fire and setting timber aflame. AP reported that the jury was split 10-2 in favor of acquittal on all three charges and that Judge Anne Hwang declared a mistrial after finding the panel deadlocked.

AP reported that prosecutors said they would retry the case. The Los Angeles Times also reported that the mistrial was a major setback for the federal case and that jurors deliberated before telling the court they could not agree.

Why it matters

The case matters because the Palisades Fire caused deep public trauma in Los Angeles County, and a criminal trial over its origin carries consequences for victims, residents, firefighters, prosecutors and the defendant. A mistrial leaves the case unresolved and forces both sides to decide how to approach a possible retrial.

Legally, a mistrial is not an acquittal and not a conviction. It means the jury did not reach the unanimous decision required in the criminal case. Rinderknecht remains presumed innocent unless and until prosecutors prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt in a future proceeding.

What remains unclear

The next trial schedule, evidentiary disputes and any changes in prosecution or defense strategy remain unclear. The case also leaves broader questions for Los Angeles residents about fire investigation, public accountability and how courts handle allegations tied to large-scale disasters.

CGN News is not treating the government’s allegations as proven facts. Prosecutors accused Rinderknecht of starting the fire, while the defense challenged the case and argued another cause was more likely. A retrial would put those claims before another jury unless prosecutors change course.

What to watch next

Watch for a new trial date, pretrial motions, custody decisions, and any statements from federal prosecutors or defense counsel. The most important legal update will be whether prosecutors proceed exactly as announced or adjust the case before a retrial.

Additional Reporting By: Associated Press; Los Angeles Times

What This Means

This story matters because a mistrial leaves one of Los Angeles County’s most closely watched wildfire cases unresolved.

The next step is to watch whether federal prosecutors set a retrial date and how the court handles pretrial issues before the case returns to a jury.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Sponsored placement